Skip to content

Stimulusol XR

Unless you are a Governor

BHO last night

“This time, CEOs won’t be able to use taxpayer money to pad their paychecks or buy fancy drapes or disappear on a private jet.”

Backpedalling

Nanny Bloomberg changes his tune on the upper middle class. Are BHO and the Protobama paying attention?

WSJ

“One percent of the households that file in this city pay something like 50% of the taxes,” explained the Mayor. “In the city, that’s something like 40,000 people. If a handful left, any raise would make it revenue neutral. The question is what’s fair. If 1% are paying 50% of the taxes, you want to make it even more?”

It begins…

CNBC’s Rick Santelli (and friends)

Ouch

Jim Treacher on Travis v. BHO

Young Obamunist

h/t to somebody whose domain name is a “hate crime” in Mass

What the hell happened to my layout?

I don’t have time for this.

Bipartisan?

There was more bipartisan opposition than support.

WaPo

Senior advisers to President Obama on Sunday defended passage of the economic stimulus bill in Congress as a bipartisan effort, even though it received only three Republican votes in the Senate and none in the House.

What was the big hurry…

if he isn’t going to sign the goddamn thing until Monday? Were they afraid someone would read it?

A prescient Goldwater editorial

Barry Goldwater wrote this guest editorial in 1937 for the Phoenix Gazette. It is included in the wonderful book Pure Goldwater by John Dean and Barry Goldwater Jr.

Guest Editorial: “A Fireside Chat with Mr. Roosevelt” (June 19, 1937)

My friend: You have, for over five years, been telling me about your plans; how much they were going to do for me; how much they were going to mean to me. Now I want to turn around and ask you just what have they done that would be of any value to me as a businessman and a citizen?

Your plans, if I recall 1932 correctly, called for economy in government and a reduction in taxes. In five years you have spent more than this government of ours spent in its entire history before 1932. In five years my taxes have increased over 250 percent and I fear greatly that “I ain’t seen half of it yet.”

You had the very commendable plan of bettering the conditions of the working man. Have you done that? Well, I wonder. True, hours are shorter, which is fine, but wages, well wages have been raised hourly but the working man is working less hours due to an industrial condition that your plans alone have caused, so the working man is making the same, or a little less, than he did before. The worst thing about your labor plan has been you have turned over to the racketeering practices of ill-organized unions the future of the working man. Witness the chaos they are creating in the eastern cities. Witness the men thrown out of work, the riots, the bloodshed, and the ll feeling between labor and capital and then decide for yourself if that plan worked.

You were confronted with a staggering number of unemployed when you took over in 1932. You immediately set up boards numerous enough to tax the entire run of the alphabet to name them in an effort to stamp out this evil. But in spite of your plans we still have just about as many unemployed in our midst as we did back in 1932.

Somewhere in your planning you thought it necessary to jump down the throats of everyone in business and where has it gotten you? No place. Instead of the businessman having confidence in you today, he distrusts you and fears your every utterance.

Now you are going to prime the pump—but are you? Isn’t that money really going to prime a few votes? Will it get into the channels of business or will it get into weak districts?

Now, these are but a few of the things that go through my mind as I think of you. I, as a businessman and citizen, am very interested in the queer antics of those in Washington. I would like to know just where you are leading us. Are you going further into the morass that you have led us into or are you going to go back to the good old American way of doing things where business is trusted, where labor earns more, where we take care of our unemployed, and where a man is elected to office because he is a good man for the job and not because he commands your good will and a few dollars of the taxpayer’s money? I would like to know because I like the old-fashioned way of being an American a lot better than the way we are headed now.

BHO planning to corral you

Classical Values

Obama has a plan for herding his cattle (or should that be sheeple) into cities where they will be more amenable to Democrat machine politics.

That’s why I’d like to see high speed rail where it can be constructed. That’s why I would like to invest in mass transit because potentially that’s energy efficient and I think people are alot more open now to thinking regionally in terms of how we plan our transportation infrastructure. The days where we’re just building sprawl forever, those days are over.

America vs Hopenchange

He values your opinion after the fact.

He forces a mortgage on you and the asks if you want it.

whitehouse.gov

Definining Hopenchange down

Instapundit

JUST WORDS? CHANGE.GOV PROMISES:

End the Practice of Writing Legislation Behind Closed Doors: As president, Barack Obama will restore the American people’s trust in their government by making government more open and transparent. Obama will work to reform congressional rules to require all legislative sessions, including committee mark-ups and conference committees, to be conducted in public. By making these practices public, the American people will be able to hold their leaders accountable for wasteful spending and lawmakers won’t be able to slip favors for lobbyists into bills at the last minute.

Instead we got a bill that the lobbyists got before the Congressmen, which will pass without being read. Hope and change?

I took longer…

to read my $250k mortgage than these assholes have taken to read an $800B mortgage